Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 114
  1. #46
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kali-Kalifornia
    Posts
    14,295
    HHAA....I'll take that beat over literally everything on Life Is Good. Most all of it sounded too glossy and heavily orchestrated to me.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    40,115
    Are you trying to say it was....

    "overproduced"? Please don't say that's so.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kali-Kalifornia
    Posts
    14,295
    No. I said exactly what I ****ing meant to say. Nice try though, guy.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    40,115
    What you said seemed like exactly what I interpreted it as.. Too glossy?

    You could explain, or you could be a ****ing prick(again) for no reason.

    Your choice, though... baybay.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    105
    The Lenster goes into threads on this site with interesting titles only to think to himself "how the **** can these kids turn an album release thread into an argument?!" It never fails to amaze me.

    Half this album is enjoyable, the other half is lost.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    16,820
    I'll give this album credit... it's better than the abomination they call 'Distant Relatives'.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle916:22973386
    I'll give this album credit... it's better than the abomination they call 'Distant Relatives'.
    If the Lenster and you were in a library together we could argue about it.

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    14,928
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle916 View Post
    I'll give this album credit... it's better than the abomination they call 'Distant Relatives'.
    I enjoyed that very much

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    40,115
    Distant Relatives wasn't too good... certainly wasn't an abomination, but I don't listen to it much.

    I still love Untitled more than about any Nas album, but this is better.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    16,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Lenny View Post
    If the Lenster and you were in a library together we could argue about it.
    Quote Originally Posted by .Sean. View Post
    I enjoyed that very much
    Everybody who was around here when it dropped know I despised it.

    It's turned into a PSD 'inside joke' essentially...

  11. #56
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kali-Kalifornia
    Posts
    14,295
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle916 View Post
    I'll give this album credit... it's better than the abomination they call 'Distant Relatives'.
    Oh man was that an abomination. I expected a lot more with the talent involved. Couldn't even make it through that LP once.

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    16,820
    It was the cheesiest, corniest thing I've ever listened to.

  13. #58
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Kali-Kalifornia
    Posts
    14,295
    Quote Originally Posted by Buckwheat View Post
    What you said seemed like exactly what I interpreted it as.. Too glossy?

    You could explain, or you could be a ****ing prick(again) for no reason.

    Your choice, though... baybay.
    Ahh....you're using my own taunt(s) against me; how cute. I find it funny because you'd always get so butt-hurt so often when I disagreed with you in the past, and even stated that you thought I had it out for you or some ****. Fully not the case, but obviously I've rubbed you the wrong way.

    When it comes down to it though, I really don't give a **** about what you think of my opinions and tastes so I'm not gonna waste much time explaining my thoughts here.

    We disagree. Not much else to say. I generally prefer raw, gritty beats more than the bourgeoisie sounding **** that's scattered across this album, and the beats tend to make an album for me more so than the vocals.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle916:22973881
    It was the cheesiest, corniest thing I've ever listened to.
    The first time the Lenster listened to it he was in a library going over a walkthrough for Star Trek online. The Lenster had to leave immediately with no words.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    40,115
    Quote Originally Posted by spliff(TONE) View Post
    Ahh....you're using my own taunt(s) against me; how cute. I find it funny because you'd always get so butt-hurt so often when I disagreed with you in the past, and even stated that you thought I had it out for you or some ****. Fully not the case, but obviously I've rubbed you the wrong way.

    When it comes down to it though, I really don't give a **** about what you think of my opinions and tastes so I'm not gonna waste much time explaining my thoughts here.

    We disagree. Not much else to say. I generally prefer raw, gritty beats more than the bourgeoisie sounding **** that's scattered across this album, and the beats tend to make an album for me more so than the vocals.
    Taunt? It's my term of endearment for you, Spliffy.

    I don't care what you think about your own opinions or mine.. I was simply discussing this album and trying to understand what you meant and you acted like a complete prick.

    No wonder I think you have it out for me. I try discussing something with you and it's just impossible.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •