Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 82
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    432

    Does the NL have a top team?

    The AL has the Rangers, Yankees, Tigers. The NL has....Miami? Phillies? DBacks? Cardinals? None of the teams (at least early in the season) really look like a top team in the MLB. Who do you guys think could be a legit contender at the end of the season. I could see the Giants, Dbacks, Cards and Phillies possibly being contenders but definitely not right now.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,172
    If the Phillies can get Howard/Utley back and healthy and productive, it's them.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    6,762
    Every team has ifs.

    Dbacks just lost Chris Young and their top 2 pitchers are due to regress.
    Giants can't hit, plus Lincecum looks like poop.
    Phillies need Utley and Howard back... but who knows about them.
    Cards need at least one of Carpenter or Wainwright to be their ace. Carp is hurt and Wain is struggling.

    12 games in, it's hard to tell.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    On The Block
    Posts
    30,233
    The Rangers and Yankees are better than every NL team. The Tigers aren't.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,284
    Coming into the season it looked like the top 5-6 teams in the AL were better than the top teams in the NL. Cant really draw any conclusions from what's happened so far.

    The cardinals have looked the best in the nl.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by LADTXR View Post
    The AL has the Rangers, Yankees, Tigers. The NL has....Miami? Phillies? DBacks? Cardinals? None of the teams (at least early in the season) really look like a top team in the MLB. Who do you guys think could be a legit contender at the end of the season. I could see the Giants, Dbacks, Cards and Phillies possibly being contenders but definitely not right now.
    does the al have a top TEAM? not teams, like you mentioned?

    yes, the al has top TEAMS with the rangers and tigers. I'm not ready to put the yankees in that category. will they be a playoff team? most likely. but their starting rotation is still spotty. freddy garcia? how will he hold up? can nova be more than a one year wonder? all im saying is, yes they are good, but the consistancy in their rotation is not there.

    the nl likewise has top TEAMS with the cardinals and phillies when healthy.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    303

    Thumbs down

    Quote Originally Posted by CHRISDODGERS View Post
    Every team has ifs.

    Dbacks just lost Chris Young and their top 2 pitchers are due to regress.
    Giants can't hit, plus Lincecum looks like poop.
    Phillies need Utley and Howard back... but who knows about them.
    Cards need at least one of Carpenter or Wainwright to be their ace. Carp is hurt and Wain is struggling.

    12 games in, it's hard to tell.
    I am aware you said it's 12 games and it's hard to tell But seriously c'mon now. The D-backs have alot of Power. Even with Young out they still have upton, Goldschmidt, montero. They have a decent Bull pen and decent at the SP position.

    The Giants are something else, Lincecum hasn't found himself yet, We lost wilson. We haven't really figured a more consistent Outfield rotation, We're hoping freddy comes back. But I think the Giants or the D-Backs end up winning the West or the Wildcard.

    The Rockies don't have enough pitching, the Padres...Um Well...Yeah and The Doyers, Have Kemp and Ethier, When we get deeper in the the season, That'll be the Theme to the Dodgers Offense, JUST Kemp and Ethier LoL. Major props to Kershaw but if you think the Dodgers are going to run away with the West. The 2011 Division champs and the 2010 WS Champs have a thing to say about it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    303
    To answer the Thread Question, I would say at this Point the Cards.

    As the Season goes Along, It'll the the Cards cause they're balanced, Pitching and O. The Giants because of their Pitching and They'll have enough Hitting compared to last year to score enough to win. The D-backs because they have decent Pitching and an Explosive Offense. Phillies if they can Stay Healthy.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    North Beach, San Francisco
    Posts
    5,341
    I don't think the NL has a team that is head and shoulders above the rest (this year). That's something I do like about the NL: while the best teams are generally in the AL, I do believe there is more competitive balance in the NL, which makes it more fun to follow as a fan of an NL team, in my opinion.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    14,028
    To repeat a point I have made recently, I absolutely believe that the World Series winner this year will absolutely be from the American League. None of this season's National League teams can hold a candle to the teams of the American League. The Phillies offense looks like **** without Utley and Howard. The Giants score no runs at all. The Braves offense and pitching has been very questionable lately. The Reds pitching again has proven to be brutal and the Cards have two pitchers who are either hurt or not performing. The only team in the NL that can see having any chance of winning the World Series is the Dodgers. With Kemp and Eithier and Kershaw, they will likely be in the race for the pennant.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,646
    Philadelphia is the only team I would consider a true contender from the National League. That being said, I wouldn't have called the Cardinals a true contender last year after losing Wainwright, but they still managed to sneak their way into the playoffs and win just enough to get the trophy.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    43,962
    i dont think so. The NL seems wide open to me
    30 Team Stadium Checklist: 12 to go

    1) Yankees 2) Orioles 3) Rays 4) Red Sox 5) Mets 6) Braves 7) Phillies 8) Nationals 9) Marlins 10) Pirates 11) Padres 12) Astros 13) Mariners 14) Twins 15) Cubs 16) White Sox 17) Cardinals 18) Indians 19) Tigers (June 8th 2013)

    BRETT GARDNER HOME RUN METER

    HOME RUN COUNT: 3

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by VRP723 View Post
    The Rangers and Yankees are better than every NL team. The Tigers aren't.
    The Yankees won't even make it past the first round of the playoffs and that's if they make it past Tampa for the AL East champ. There pitching is suspect and Jeter and Rodriguez are past their date of expiration!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,060
    Quote Originally Posted by VRP723 View Post
    The Rangers and Yankees are better than every NL team. The Tigers aren't.
    How do you figure that when the Tigers are an all around better team than the Yankees?
    #teamboom4life

    MLB: Tigers
    NFL: Lions
    NHL: Red Wings
    CFB(Div I): Michigan
    CFB(Div II): Hillsdale

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    63
    I don't see the Yankees as being in the top 3 of the American League....

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •