Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 51
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    27

    Eagles interested in trading up to No. 4


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    167
    If for blackmon i would do it. Hopefully they arent looking for tannehill at that high

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    35,241
    I'll be honest, I kind of really like Tannenhill if the Browns aren't looking for an insane price.

    He's a little project, but he moves, he's got a rocket arm, and I don't think the Browns are looking for the bounty that the Rams got.

    Depends on the price, really. With Bell, Ryans and Landri back in the fold, we're a little more open to moving up than before when we needed a LB.
    Stoops....there it is!
    Fix it. Fix it good.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    10,519
    We'll see. It's only 2 more weeks

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    27

    Shouldn't do it

    Moving up to 4 would be strictly for Tannehill. More than likely we would give up our 1 and both 2s. I honestly don't think he's worth both our 2s. As for Blackmon, where would he play? Neither DeSean or Maclin will drop to 3.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    699
    Please god no. As an Eagles fan who lives in Cleveland and is also a Browns fan, I hate Tannehill. I've just been beginning to think that the Browns are gonna make the right choice and NOT take him, and now this? I can't escape this guy!!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    R.D
    Posts
    15,831
    WTF this is B.S

    Authentic Phillies, Eagles , Sixers and Man City fan
    - I love Ray Lewis.

    "Do not scorn a weak cub, he may become a brutal tiger"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,903
    Good god I hope not. We've got a great opportunity to load up on depth this draft. Let's do that.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    13,301
    I want absolutely no part of Tannehill that high. When he played elite defensive competition last year (Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Oklahoma state) he struggle badly with 10 ints. I beg you Reid.....trade out and draft a better value QB later or draft one with a 1st next year with a pretty deep class projected.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Route 36 West View Post
    Good god I hope not. We've got a great opportunity to load up on depth this draft. Let's do that.
    I agree

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    417
    Tannehill isn't even going to end up being the third best QB in this draft class. Weeden is going to be a better pro. It's going to be like the Ponder and Dalton last year, in the way that a QB is way overvalued based on things other than production and the proven player drafted in the early 2nd will outproduce the first rounder.

    Eagles trades and decisions have always been under the radar, ESPECIALLY on draft day. Cleveland media is just trying to make a move and build speculation in hopes of other teams ACTUALLY getting involved. The Browns have SO many needs and don't want to draft Tannehill so they are hoping to move down and pick up more picks to address more needs. I don't expect anyone to trade up for tannehill and I think Browns take T. Rich

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    13,301
    The thing I really don't get though is why Reid would want to do this in a do or die season for him. If they go out and underachieve, I think it's a no brainier to fire him. Now he wants to draft a project, one that wouldn't play that much (maybe 3 with Vicks injuries), when your in a do or die season. They should draft a player that could help this team this year, not sit on the bench.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    587
    The only way credible way that the Eagles can mess up this draft is if they:

    1. Trade up to take a QB at the cost of improving the defense and the offense's starters and heavy rotation players.
    2. Out-think the room and reach on a player by seemingly one round or more for a player again, like with Daniel Te'o-Nesheim in the third round or Jaiquawn Jarrett in the second round.

    I'm not opposed to the Eagles trading up to take a player they really want -- as long as that player isn't a QB in the first round not named Griffin III or Luck.

    If the Eagles do this to somehow pick up OT Matt Kalil, CB Morris Claiborne, or even RB Trent Richardson then this move could work. The team's chances for winning the Super Bowl would increase.

    Hopefully this is all a smokescreen, and the Eagles will do what everybody thought they were going to do with their mid-first round pick a month or two ago: improve the defense with Kuechly or the best player available.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    12,726
    If we trade up to 4 for Tannehill I might have to consider dropping the Eagles and picking up another team.

    I wouldnt, but damn that would piss me off

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    12,472
    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    unless we get Coples
    SPACE


Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •