View Poll Results: Who do you want?

Voters
43. You may not vote on this poll
  • Michael Floyd WR

    16 37.21%
  • Courtney Upshaw OLB/DE

    4 9.30%
  • Melvin Ingram OLB/DE

    20 46.51%
  • Mark Barron SS/FS

    3 6.98%
  • Whitney Mercilus OLB/DE

    0 0%
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 53
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,957
    Quote Originally Posted by King P View Post
    Melvin Ingram.

    And if he's off the board, trade down and grab Nick Perry
    Exactly my sentiments King!

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    2,248
    Floyd, Ingram and Barron will ge GONE, at least every credible person that does this for a living says they will, although nobody knows for sure.

    I would be thrilled with any of those guys, although I have a feeling Stephen Hill is going to end up rivaling Blackmon as the top receiver taken this year - but that's based on a "freakanomics" type evaluation on ESPN Insider that evaluates the number of opportunities presented, AND the number of opportunities actaully taken advantage of, and they also break it down into short, intermediate, and long passes, and Hill had the best avg/throw at all distances, but crushed EVERYONE with long passes. I posted that article a 4-5 days ago, I don't know if anyone read it.

    That leaves Upshaw and Mercilus - and unless they've found dirt on Upshaw - REAL CHARACTER ASSIGNATION TYPE STUFF - I think Upshaw is the guy (if we pass on Hill - which, or course I know we will).

    I agree with everyone who says, "Let's trade down." The problem is, if WE don't think the talent is there worth picking at #16 - what team is going to be the idiot to trade up to 16, and actuallt give US something od value? Just a thought.

    GO JETS!!!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    (Born in NY)Miami, Fl
    Posts
    2,246
    ideally i would would love Floyd

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jersey Shore
    Posts
    2,255
    Melvin Ingram in the 1st and Doug Martin/David Wilson in the 2nd.
    **Deesert Island**

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,169
    Quote Originally Posted by $GangGr33n$ View Post
    ideally i would would love Floyd
    I'm getting the feeling that if Floyd is there at #16, he's the pick.

    If he's not, it's Defense.

    After seeing what Ingram has to offer, NO!!!
    He gets his sacks based on a non-stop motor, which is not bad, but he's not the type of OLB that will work a sack.

    Upshaw/Barron or trading down for picks or Mercilus are understandable.

    Trading down for Perry, NO!!!!!!
    Perry can NOT play the run, teams have run directly at him. Do you want to spend a 1st on a situational speed pashrusher only? I think not.


  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,169
    Quote Originally Posted by jetsfansince'67 View Post
    Floyd, Ingram and Barron will ge GONE, at least every credible person that does this for a living says they will, although nobody knows for sure.
    I do think Barron has a chance to be there of the 3.

    I agree with everyone who says, "Let's trade down." The problem is, if WE don't think the talent is there worth picking at #16 - what team is going to be the idiot to trade up to 16, and actuallt give US something od value? Just a thought.

    GO JETS!!!
    The Rams have a need at DT, if Brockers or Cox slip to #16, they may be very interested in trading up, and considering the Jets would end up with the #33 and #39 picks, it could end up a win/win scenerio for both teams.

    Someone put a trade down to Cleveland at #22, but in no way do the Jets trade down and give up more picks then they'd receive.


  7. #22
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    233
    I see the Jets really like Ingram

    April 13th, 10PM
    - This may come as no surprise but the chatter is getting louder from league insiders that the primary strategy for the New York Jets in round one would be trading up for Melvin Ingram of South Carolina. Who are potential trade partners? The Jacksonville Jaguars for starters, though we hear there will be competition for that selection if it comes into play.



    http://www.draftinsider.net/blog/?p=6238

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    667
    Wow. I don't think he's that good but that's me.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jersey Shore
    Posts
    2,255
    People that think Ingram isn't that good are on crack. He's widely the most athletic LB in the draft.
    **Deesert Island**

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    667
    He's good but not elite player. He overpurses the ball and is easily guided away.
    Last edited by cp yankeesman; 04-14-2012 at 09:48 PM.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,169
    Quote Originally Posted by JetsNation24 View Post
    People that think Ingram is widely the most athletic LB in the draft are on crack.
    Fixed.


  12. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,102
    He's the most versatile, not the most athletic. I think he'd be a great pick at 16. Not a fan of trading up for him and losing our 2nd or even 3rd rounder though

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    4,022
    Michael Floyd or Mark Barron at 16 please...take the best available OLB in the 2nd round round please. Thanks.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,102
    There's a fair chance neither is there at 16

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    4,022
    Quote Originally Posted by Chest Rockwell View Post
    There's a fair chance neither is there at 16
    There's a good chance Barron will be there. Floyd is like 50/50 I can see someone snagging him around 10-12 overall but you never know what will happen on draft day.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •