Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: NL Divisional Winner

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • NL EAST

    2 10.53%
  • Mets

    0 0%
  • Marlins

    0 0%
  • Nationals

    8 42.11%
  • NL CENTRAL

    4 21.05%
  • Brewers

    0 0%
  • Cubs

    0 0%
  • Reds

    4 21.05%
  • Cardinals

    5 26.32%
  • Pirates

    0 0%
  • Astros

    0 0%
  • NL WEST

    3 15.79%
  • Diamondbacks

    0 0%
  • Giants

    2 10.53%
  • Dodgers

    7 36.84%
  • Rockies

    0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 53
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Deutschland
    Posts
    15,946
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by AI4LIFE View Post
    "><=" breakdowns are so stupid
    I know right

    Saying team A > team B is soo stupid

    And by the way, those pants, they belong to my dad.And they're not really pants,
    they're Lederhosen



  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    22,742
    vCash
    8600
    Quote Originally Posted by Fly View Post
    lol at peavy being better than hanson.
    Saw that

    Laughed hard for a few minutes

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    22,742
    vCash
    8600
    Quote Originally Posted by Fukudome4MVP View Post
    You took the Cardinals, which is fine...but they have 3 OF and a C on their bench.


    I have you as a WC, if it makes you feel better

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    4,527
    vCash
    500
    Nah, honestly, it doesn't bother me because their team is very good, just I feel that it's incomplete with their bench, and I feel like not having any IF's on their bench puts them behind us because of our depth.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    12,831
    vCash
    1500
    Braves
    Reds
    Dodgers


  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Deutschland
    Posts
    15,946
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Superdude901 View Post
    Saw that

    Laughed hard for a few minutes
    Then you should be laughing for a few hours at Hudson pitching ahead of Hanson -The-Gr8

    And by the way, those pants, they belong to my dad.And they're not really pants,
    they're Lederhosen



  7. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    22,742
    vCash
    8600
    Quote Originally Posted by j0h@n63 View Post
    Then you should be laughing for a few hours at Hudson pitching ahead of Hanson -The-Gr8
    That really doesn't bother me. The fact that you think Peavy, right now is better than Tommy Hanson is utterly laughable

    Peavy hasn't pitched more than 111 innings since 2008, and is clearly on the downside of his career. Both has similar numbers in a similar number of innings pitched, but Hanson is much younger and entering into the prime of his career.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Deutschland
    Posts
    15,946
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Superdude901 View Post
    That really doesn't bother me. The fact that you think Peavy, right now is better than Tommy Hanson is utterly laughable

    Peavy hasn't pitched more than 111 innings since 2008, and is clearly on the downside of his career. Both has similar numbers in a similar number of innings pitched, but Hanson is much younger and entering into the prime of his career.
    It's funny how he pitched 111 IP this past season.

    It's evident that Peavy couldn't pitch in the AL.
    Even still, in less IP/starts last season, he pitched better than Hanson.

    Hanson is coming off a rotator cuff injury. Hmm. Good sign for his future? Not at all.

    And by the way, those pants, they belong to my dad.And they're not really pants,
    they're Lederhosen



  9. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    22,742
    vCash
    8600
    And I, as will anyone else take Hansen coming into next season over Peavy.

    It's foolish to think otherwise

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    22,742
    vCash
    8600
    Fixed the votes to not include Joh@n's votes

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Deutschland
    Posts
    15,946
    vCash
    1500
    I don't see how the Nats even have votes. Their 1-2-3 starters are awesome, but that's about it.

    Furcal gets injured every 2nd day, same with Sizemore. Even when playing, they aren't that good anymore
    Werth played horrible last season. Willingham is hitting sub .250.

    Their bullpen also got worse from last year.

    And by the way, those pants, they belong to my dad.And they're not really pants,
    they're Lederhosen



  12. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Deutschland
    Posts
    15,946
    vCash
    1500
    The Nats + Braves should be DQed for not having a 25-man roster.

    And by the way, those pants, they belong to my dad.And they're not really pants,
    they're Lederhosen



  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    22,742
    vCash
    8600
    Ugh I apparently can't count. Braves don't have enough.

    Nationals do however. 25 man max, 24 min

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    22,742
    vCash
    8600
    Since the Braves are DQ'd anyone who voted for them will post who they want to vote for here, and ill update the board.

    Nationals

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    12,831
    vCash
    1500
    Nationals


Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •