Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    635
    The definition of "Core players" is who a team should build around for the future. So your wrong, Adam is apart of the core along with Vanek, Myers and Mcnabb. There were no free agent center's last year and there is none this year coming up. So Adam, who is playing great, should be a player the Sabres try to build around, being that he probably will be our 2nd line center next year. Mcnabb and Myers are our core because you will never find big stron defenseman like that. Vanek is our core for obvious reasons. He has never played with great players, but scores 30 and carried this team on his back last year for something like 20 points in the last 11 games.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,454
    Quote Originally Posted by sabres11 View Post
    The definition of "Core players" is who a team should build around for the future. So your wrong, Adam is apart of the core along with Vanek, Myers and Mcnabb. There were no free agent center's last year and there is none this year coming up. So Adam, who is playing great, should be a player the Sabres try to build around, being that he probably will be our 2nd line center next year. Mcnabb and Myers are our core because you will never find big stron defenseman like that. Vanek is our core for obvious reasons. He has never played with great players, but scores 30 and carried this team on his back last year for something like 20 points in the last 11 games.
    If we trade away Hecht, Roy, McCormick and Gaustad, then Adam may indeed be the second line center next year. Pretty telling that when Hecht was one game back from a concussion Adam got demoted from the first line to the fourth. He is on the team this year because of injuries.
    Epic Thread that Provided Many LOLs

    Since Then: 1 - 3
    Vikings 10 at Bears 32
    Seahawks 23 at Bears 17
    Bears 14 at Vikings 21
    Packers 21 at Bears 13

    85BearsDefense: "I see 5 wins" and "Bears will go no worse than 11-5 and I was tempted to say 12-4"

    jpro611: "Can't wait until the Bears are 10-3 before the Pack game"

    Pinestripe_power: "no chance the bears lose more than two of them. no chance"

  3. 01-17-2012, 04:38 PM
    Reason
    not needed

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •