Saber is extremely valuable to get glimpses/snapshots of player abilities. But this is proof that saber isn't everything. Further proof that baseball is 100% situational
Saber is extremely valuable to get glimpses/snapshots of player abilities. But this is proof that saber isn't everything. Further proof that baseball is 100% situational
Huge thanks to Elements!!
Thanks for nothing "jej" for stealing my Montero sig
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
Dunn got abducted by aliens or something like that, that would be the most sensible explanation, really.
Crawford I haven't seen his numbers but he was overrated, that contract was sillier than Werth's
Did you ignore every post in this threads? There were things ("saber things" if you want to call them) that were pointing to this. They were just ignored by a stupid GM / writers.
If anything you have it backwards. Watching games themselves are great ways to get snapshots of player abilities, while sabrmetrics sums them up.
Well said, chensisi123.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
I had Crawford as a bust in Boston before the signing. I haven't wavered since and here are the base arguments.
Batting:
Crawford's career slash in Fenway before 2011 was: .275/.301/.406
Some said it was the pitching he faced, others that he wasn't used to the park, or piled up those stats when young and he wasn't that good. Fact is, TBR is turf and Red Sox has a very thick grass infield. CC as a speed player is going to lose quite a few hits per year.
Crawfords's power is the RCF - the toughest place in Fenway to hit a HR besides dead Center and one of the 5 hardest in all of baseball. To underscore that point had gone from May 26th 2006 thru end of season 2010 w/o a HR in Fenway - over 200 PA's. It turns out he went until June 5th 2011 - over 5 years and over 340 PA's in Fenway between HR's.
Jump forward: Crawford's slash in Fenway in 2011: .276/.310/.414 in 252 PA's.
He is what he is. He should have played in the NL in 70's, he might be a HOF'er.
Fielding:
Crawfords best trait as a fielder is his range. His arm is meh. But in Fenway the smallest of the 90 OF's in baseball there is no place for him to range 1/2 the year. As he had before, the walls and angles seem to bother him, he'd be much better of in RF - except he'll need the cutoff guy in mid RF...
SB's:
Crawford's SBO's and CS% have been slowly declining since 2006. Combine that with the fact that Boston with a strong line-up and runs happy field (lots of 2B's and a high BA), Boston will not play for one run, but clusters of runs.
Other:
CC said in an interview in 2010 that he hated playing in Boston - too intense. Since then, his fielding has been meh seemingly because of his batting issues. He tries to hit for power to prove he deserves the contract (he said he does it when he hits lower in the order).
Summary: He was a terrible sign, he'll never come close to matching his salary. I said it before, and it's always going to be true.
Last edited by bagwell368; 11-13-2011 at 09:18 PM.