Karl Malone easily. If not for Jordan and the Bulls, Malone would have two titles.
Karl Malone easily. If not for Jordan and the Bulls, Malone would have two titles.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
No, my argument is how can you rank KG over them because he was a great defender but did not have much success as the man when those others guys did? I just used the Hakeem example as a point to show that people rank Magic or Bird over Hakeem despite Hakeem being the elite defender.
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
Thanks MJ-Bulls for the picture.
the Mailman
As it is difficult to evaluate Pettit, I'll go with Garnett as my opinion.
When you got to shoot, shoot, don't talk
I would take KG in his prime over anybody here. Better defensively, and dragged a team of scrubs within two wins of the NBA finals.
3rd to me is disco Dirk... he showed us a new version of the power forward.
4. Malone
5. Barkley
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
That in itself shows exactly why when used independently DWS is a horrible metric to ascertain a player's defensive worth.
I mean Bird has more career DWS than Kevin Mchale and that is in no way true. Jason Kidd has more than MJ and Barkley has more than Payton. DWS is highly influenced by DRtg which is highly dependent on team play. Used by itself it is not an accurate measure of a player's defensive worth, and surely doesn't measure how good a defender a player is.
Despite missing 23 games this pass season Carlos Boozer has more DWS than Marc Gasol, Trevor Ariza, Emeka Okafor, Al Horford, Gerald Wallace, Tyson Chandler, Andre Iguodala, Shawn Marion, Luc Mbah a Moute, Serge Ibaka etc etc
By no means should it be used by itself to gauge who good a defender a player is. Best way is to watch some old film and read some articles on Bird's D.
“I always let LeBron know.They love you right now, But the first bad decision...they are waiting man.They are waiting.”
Allen Iverson(2006)
Because he was a better defensive player?
He also brought more to the table (defense, play making, rebounding) than Dirk. Just because Dirk is a better winner than KG that doesn't necessarily means that Dirk is better. Dirk was more fortunate than KG in terms of who he had around him and also who was at the helm of his organization.
JB please don't say Dirk won a title with no other all star and beat 3 teams with All NBA 1st and 2nd players. You may hold that in high regard but IMO Great Teams who play hard and work well together wins championships not 1st and 2nd team players.
Had KG had such a formidable supporting cast of players during his prime years I am confident that he to would be in the running for a title.
“I always let LeBron know.They love you right now, But the first bad decision...they are waiting man.They are waiting.”
Allen Iverson(2006)
tough call between barkley and mchale.
i haven't seen pettit and mchale play, are KG and dirk really better?
difficult, pf is one of the most difficult positions to rate all time.
too many greats: (more or less a cronological list of league entry)
Dolph Schayes, Pettit, Thurmond ( played both center and pf),Debuschere, Lucas,Mcginnis, Issell, Hayes,Sikma(pf/c) Mchale, Buck Williams, Barkley, Malone, Chambers, nance,Rodman, Webber, Kg, Tim Duncan, Dirk, Rasheed, Pau Gasol .
all of them can be argued as top 10
[SUMMER IS COMING
To be fair, Dirk has always had an owner willing to spend and add necessary pieces that would benefit him, whether it would be through picks or trades (E.g Dampier, Jamison, Chandler, Terry etc)..
If I'm not mistaken, Minnesota lost a bunch 3 draft picks due to the Joe Smith failed deal (2001, 2002, and I think 2004, but not completely sure), so they couldn't develop talent... they also basically surrounded KG with players that would make the Raptors look good... the only exception would be 2003-2004 when they were able to get Cassell to help, but unfortunately The hall of fame Lakers were too much for them.
I don't see Dirk going anywhere with some of the teams KG had to suffer through in Minnesota.
Yes
| Sponsored Links |
|
|