Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Andrew Luck's world
    Posts
    75,324
    vCash
    1500

    Projecting next year's offense with current roster

    Especially with the loss of Christian Ehrhoff, some of the fears expressed by Vancouver fans (or the delights from the now legions of Vancouver haters) is that the league's highest scoring team last season can't possibly reclaim that title a second year in a row.

    Taking a page from On The Forecheck and Blackhawk Up, let's take a quick look at Vancouver's possible offensive production in 2011 using projections of each player's career goal scoring rate over an 82-game spread.

    The numbers in bold ballpark the amount of goals expected per player:

    D. Sedin (26.2) - H. Sedin (15.6) - Burrows (20.5)

    Higgins (21.3) - Kesler (22.1) - Samuelsson (18)

    Sturm (22.1) - Malhotra (10.7) - Hansen (10.7)

    Oreskovich (2.5) - Lapierre (9.8) - Ebbett (10.7)

    Bieksa (8.2) - Hamhuis (5.7)

    Edler (9) - Salo (9.8)

    Ballard (6.5) - Rome (1.6)

    Whenever Raymond is healthy enough to touch his toes, his career average would work out to be 18 goals per year.

    The grand total is 231, or roughly a 11.5% decrease from their 258 goals last season. 231 would tie them with Carolina last season for 12th best overall.

    Obviously there are a number of caveats with this approach: there will be the obvious injuries and call-ups. On top of that these lines aren't complete; I threw Ebbett in because Hodgson (remember him?) Duco, Pinizzotto, Mancuri and other assorted bottom six options have next to no NHL records. This approach doesn't account for a camp stand out like Sweatt, Archibald or Schroeder upsetting the apple cart. It also ignores special teams; Vancouver's 72 PPGs in the regular season was best in the league so that's a big chunk of red lights to casually dismiss.

    Nevertheless, unless a trade comes through or a few players have career years again, it's certainly possible the offense takes a step back. The biggest question mark will always be injuries, particularly with Sturm, Salo and Samuelsson representing 50 goals, or 20% of the team's overall output.

    Then again assuming Hansen returns alongside Mahlotra (and both click with a delightfully healthy Samuelsson or Sturm) they maintain a top nine that remains one of the strongest they've had in their history. Raymond sitting in reserve is an obvious bonus. Lastly - and we can't stress this enough - losing Mr. Errorhoff should presumably help the backend be more responsible which is hardly a bad thing over the course of 82 games.

    As always, the glass is half full or half empty depending on your outlook. Drink up.
    http://canucksarmy.com/2011/7/22/eye...0-2011-offense

    Not much going on now..
    #3in5


    <3
    "[He's] a really complete player... There's not really any weaknesses to his game." - Bill Belichick on Andrew Luck
    "Vontae Davis looks like Bumgarner of the San Francisco Giants. He's throwing a no hitter out there tonight" - Jon Gruden

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,539
    vCash
    1500
    seems low for daniel, kesler and burrows and too high for sturm and higgins

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    25,074
    vCash
    1500
    ^ I was thinking the same but it is technically just based off career averages so meh.
    TAKE PRIDE

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Andrew Luck's world
    Posts
    75,324
    vCash
    1500
    Article states it doesn't include power play goals.
    #3in5


    <3
    "[He's] a really complete player... There's not really any weaknesses to his game." - Bill Belichick on Andrew Luck
    "Vontae Davis looks like Bumgarner of the San Francisco Giants. He's throwing a no hitter out there tonight" - Jon Gruden

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,081
    vCash
    1500
    The Canucks have taken a step back since last season, or is it two or three steps back? They have lost: Ehrhoff, Torres, Tambellini, Glass, and from the Moose (Rypien, Shirokov, Sweatt and Bolduc)

    How have they filled these holes? Sturm and a bunch of no-names. Plus, they'll be without Raymond for half the season.

    Will they make the playoffs? Yes, probably. But until Gillis makes an impact move, I can't see much success beyond that. The other teams in the western conference have made improvements to their rosters. I just hope the Canucks can contend that those teams this season. Now that they all know how to shut down the Sedins, and who knows how banged up Kesler will be again trying to carry this team on his back.

    Fingers crossed Gillis trades Hodgson and/or one of our goalies, to bring in a top 6 forward.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Andrew Luck's world
    Posts
    75,324
    vCash
    1500
    the problem is we have so many damn fringe 2nd/3rd line players. Samuelsson, Raymond, Higgins, Hansen, Sturm are not 2nd line players and we play them on our 2nd line expecting to get great results. None of them are 2nd line players so of course we're not going to get the results. We are lacking that one legitimate winger. It's annoying. Kesler is the only player on that 2nd line that im comfortable with. I really like Higgins though, but maybe he was just playing for a contract last year.

    We are perfect defensively. And our bottom 6 is fine the way it is. I actually like the Duco/Bitz/Mancari pickups. Just that one glaring hole....
    #3in5


    <3
    "[He's] a really complete player... There's not really any weaknesses to his game." - Bill Belichick on Andrew Luck
    "Vontae Davis looks like Bumgarner of the San Francisco Giants. He's throwing a no hitter out there tonight" - Jon Gruden

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •