Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 2 of 86 FirstFirst 12341252 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 1281
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,009
    vCash
    500
    shaq in his prime >>>>> duncan

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    10,590
    vCash
    1500
    Why isn't derrick rose on the list yet?
    'Cause my life is dope, and I do dope shi*

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,214
    vCash
    1500
    5 of the top 8 are Lakers... pretty crazy if you ask me

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    15,417
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by NYsFinest View Post
    5 of the top 8 are Lakers... pretty crazy if you ask me
    Wilt and KAJ had their primes on the Sixers/Warriors and Bucks respectively, and Shaq was a mix of Magic/Lakers prime while winning another ship as a key component in Miami (conglomerate player), so I wouldn't call them "Lakers". But word - they had some monsters.

    Lakers + Celtics took all the talent. Except the one that matters most.

  5. 07-17-2011, 11:06 PM
    Reason
    duplicate account

  6. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    28,954
    vCash
    1500
    I'd still have Magic in the top 3 though.

    I'd go as far as to say #2.


    Free As Seagull.

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    15,417
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by legalize View Post
    Kareem is a Laker. He won 5 titles with the Lakers, has his jersey hanging on the rafters and was working with the Lakers organization for the past few years.

    Shaq will have his jersey retired with the Lakers and won 3 out of 4 rings with the Lakers.

    Wilt on the other hand, you can argue was more of a hybrid, however its certainly is amazing that Lakers have about half of the top 10 of all time.

    Which goes to show that when a player joins the Lakers, he is generally joined by superior talent, a better coach and just a generally better opportunity to earn rings; thus, "HEZ A LAKER!".

    But, were Wilt or Kareem better players on the Lakers than they were on their prior teams? No, definitely not. But on the Lakers, you're made a legend. Food for thought.

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    501
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Raph12 View Post
    Let's not overdo it here, Kareem was better than Wilt, but Bill was not anywhere near that level of dominance. It's pretty close in every aspect besides scoring, where Wilt was an dominant and yet very efficient machine, while Bill made AI look like god... No contest, put Wilt on that Celts team and they win 13 of 13.
    bill russell had more around him so he didnt have to score as much, wilt had to carry his teams most of his career. thats why scoring isnt close. bill at least equals wilt

  9. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
    Posts
    65,642
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Greetard View Post
    Why isn't derrick rose on the list yet?
    Get this garbage out of here.
    "Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
    - Michael Jordan

    Thanks MJ-Bulls for the picture.

  10. 07-18-2011, 01:10 AM
    Reason
    duplicate account

  11. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    15,417
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by legalize View Post
    Oh believe me, these guys didnt become legends because they became Lakers. On the contrary, they became Lakers because they were gonna become legends.

    The Lakers organization just knows how to get the right players.

    Just some other kind of non-biased food for thought.
    The point is that the talent is centralized (RINGZ!) - and in a media empire - as such, legends grow to a point that they likely wouldn't have had KAJ stayed a Buck, Shaq a Magic (Magician??), yada yada - while their talent and impact on the league did not.

    I'm not too sure this is debatable?

  12. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,009
    vCash
    500
    Quote Originally Posted by tredigs View Post
    The point is that the talent is centralized (RINGZ!) - and in a media empire - as such, legends grow to a point that they likely wouldn't have had KAJ stayed a Buck, Shaq a Magic (Magician??), yada yada - while their talent and impact on the league did not.

    I'm not too sure this is debatable?
    the point he is trying to get to you is that half the top ten of all time were lakers and that there is no reason for you to downplay it or add buts. Thats all he is trying to say to you. And no, it is not debatable that 5 of the 10 players all time were lakers lol. kareem was in his prime when he came to LA. shaq hit a new level of dominance with the lakers that he didnt see with orlando. kobe and magic played their entire careers in LA. Wilt could be considered a hybrid but hey he got his ring in LA and spent a good amount of time in los angeles too.

  13. 07-19-2011, 02:50 PM
    Reason
    duplicate account

  14. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    33,712
    vCash
    1894
    Yea tre, stop adding buts to his point

    "It’s absolutely ludicrous” (to judge players based on whether they’ve won a title.)

  15. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    33,712
    vCash
    1894
    Oops nevr mnd
    Last edited by Chronz; 07-19-2011 at 02:59 PM.

    "It’s absolutely ludicrous” (to judge players based on whether they’ve won a title.)

  16. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    24,063
    vCash
    1500
    Bleacher Report made a list but it's kinda bad.
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/7...n-and-kobe-now

  17. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Posts
    14,914
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by B'sCeltsPatsSox View Post
    Bleacher Report made a list but it's kinda bad.
    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/7...n-and-kobe-now
    I know you just wanted to share but word of advice anything you see on Bleacher Report just ignore bro. They are incredibly inconsistent and in no form or fashion should they be taken seriously.

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/6...rs-of-all-time

    That's a top 25 where the got MJ 3rd behind Kareem and Magic and their readers for the most part agree.

  18. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    24,063
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Swashcuff View Post
    I know you just wanted to share but word of advice anything you see on Bleacher Report just ignore bro. They are incredibly inconsistent and in no form or fashion should they be taken seriously.

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/6...rs-of-all-time

    That's a top 25 where the got MJ 3rd behind Kareem and Magic and their readers for the most part agree.
    Yeah most of there stuff is not credible at all.

Page 2 of 86 FirstFirst 12341252 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •