
Originally Posted by
tredigs
Sigh.
...I started to, but I just don't have the energy for another one of these today. Eh actually I'll play a little...
In short: Individual talent? Wilt > Bill. Defense/leadership? Bill >>> Wilt (dude was still leading the team to Championships as a PLAYER/COACH for God's sake. And that was when Wilt was with Jerry West on the Lakers and HEAVILY FAVORED to beat Boston). And c'mon Raph, you are obviously significantly underrating Russel's offense - who was an incredible passer for a big, had relatively high efficiency for his era relative to the competition (top ten in efficiency multiple years), and flat out was the smartest/grittiest player on the court every night from every account I've read and games I've watched.
Sort of reminds me of Duncan and Howards shot-blocking in 2008. Where Duncan's were worth 1.12 ppb (highest in the NBA), and Howards were worth 0.53 ppb (worst in the NBA). Some players put up great counting stats, others play to win, or at least do so at a much smarter/more efficient way than another.
Bill won when he was supposed to win, yes, but he also won when he wasn't supposed to win. I understand that the Celtics generally had the far better roster and that should not go unnoticed in any way, but given the choice of a player to build around in that era, I'm taking Bill every time.
and you would be right in that selection provided you had five other hall of famers on your team who couldnt go anywhere else because there was no free agency
Panic. It crept up my spine like first rising vibes of an acid frenzy. There I was. Alone in Las Vegas, completely twisted on drugs, no cash, no story for the magazine, and on top of everything else, a gigantic god damned hotel bill to deal with.