If you are putting him ahead of Brady you are overrating him. I'm sorry but it's the truth.
If you are starting a franchise and you do a draft for one year, there's no way I'm taking Manning over Brady, no way.
I wouldn't say Brady had better coaching. It's not like Dungy and Moore were dog ****.
Also that dropped passes tipped passes it wasn't the QB's fault for his INT's crap is pretty played out. It may be true but I had it being used as an excuse.
How the hell would we know? Until Cassell won them 11 games they might have said the Pats would be awful without Brady.
People act like he's turning water into wine. Guess what, Marvin Harrison, Dallas Clark, Reggie Wayne...those dudes don't owe Peyton Manning ****. They would have been good players just about anywhere they played.
And then we're going to talk about all these recent guys like Garcon and Tamme and Collie that were mediocre prospects who are productive. Okay then if we are talking recent then how come Brady's defense recently is total dog **** but he still gets them to 12+ win seasons? Magic?
Or does the fact that he used to have a good defense make it easier to for him to win in the present?
