Let us get some stuff out in the open,
Since:
Just select media and past winners vote on The Heisman Trophy,
The amount of defensive players that have won The Heisman Trophy communicates the real bias it has for offensive players,
The amount of offensive & Defensive linemen that have won The Heisman Trophy communicates the real bias it has for skill players,
The amount of non-traditional programs that have had their best players to have won The Heisman Trophy communicates the real bias it has for traditional programs best players,
The amount of popular & disliked programs (they are disliked more than liked, nationally) that have had their best players to have won The Heisman Trophy communicates the real bias it has for popular & liked programs' (they are liked more than disliked, nationally) best players,
The popular & disliked players (they are disliked more than liked, nationally) have never won The Heisman Trophy communicates the real bias it has for popular & liked players (they are liked more than disliked, nationally)
&
The Heisman Trophy has never been awarded to two-players, as if there has never been two-players that are equal or just too hard to find out who is best, I really could care less about The Heisman Trophy.
Unless these types of cheating (cannot call it anything else, when trophies by mostly media comes down to popularity) result from a horrible way the best player(s) is reward.
Do you think if one of the top offensive skill players (or if Manti Te’o played offensive skill position) performed the same exact hoax, then that player would have won The Heisman Trophy??






Reply With Quote
