
Originally Posted by
sabres11
Believe it or not, I like Miller, and if they were to land Richards, along with having Miller, this would be a tremendous statistical boast to Millers Carear and legend. But odds are, he wont come here and then were doomed with the roster we had last year. It would be a waist to repeat last year, watching a tenth seed team throughout the the majority of the season. Therefore my point is trade him for talent up front. Rolling the dice on Enroth will not be detremental to the team.
Tampa with three scorers almost went to the stanley cup with 44-year old Roloson. Is Enroth better the Roloson. Meaning if trading Miller gets us a star, couldnt Enroth do the same thing Roloson did with TB.
Look at Philly the year before. Leighten, being paid nothing, but having scorers up front, went to the finals.
Then Neimi, who made under a million won the cup. Why? because he made a few saves and had scorers up front.
If Enroth was on those teams, wouldnt the results have been the same? Its an Assumption, but it is safe to assume yes. With Miller, and the supporting cast from last year, why bother. If Miller has value, do whats best for the team, trade him and get a superstar.
With Enroth in net, the Sabres will be adequate enough at goal to contend as long as he has a couple superstars in front of him. Just Like other teams the past two seasons, such as Montreal with Halek, Chicago with Neimi, Philly with Leighten, Tampa with Roloson, Boston With Raask.
Again, we missed the playoffs, 2 out of the last four years. Now the same team might be back again for the 2012 season. What is the point of keeping Miller if we cannot lure superstars to play here with him?
Hopefully ill be eating crow and Richards will sign on Friday.