Not at all, because it is rather obvious that the Jets win more because of their defense than because of Sanchez, whereas the Patriots don't win if they don't have Brady - plus we'll forget that Brady just won MV****ingP of the league. And if you don't understand any of that, I'll make it more clear... Orton and Cutler on the Broncos? Cutler is better, but not by much. Orton and Cutler on the Bears? Well... we've seen the impact both players have on the Bears -- understand now?that sanchez in better then tom brady bc in the 2 years hes been in the league he has won more playoff games then brady and has been to 2 afc championship games and brady hasnt been to any in those 2 years....
This is some of the worst logic I've ever seen. See, at the very least, I picked MORE than one year, I picked players that have played for the same damn team. But hey, here we go, we'll ignore that Brees for the last few years has been a Top 5 QB and a SB MVP, oh and he should've been MVP of the league 2 years ago. and because we're using this logic of yours, let me show you just how ridiculous it truly is...u are saying that since hasselbeck beat brees hes better and then cutler beat hasselbeck so cutler is the 2nd best qb in the nfc behind rodgers, bc rodgers beat him twice....
Muhammad Ali = Greatest Boxer of all Time (while i find this arguable, we'll say this is true)
Trevor Berbick = Beat Muhammad Ali.
So - by your logic - if Muhammad Ali is the greatest of all time, and Trevor Berbick beat him, then that means Trevor Berbick is the greatest of all time and not Ali... At least... that's just how your logic is twisting it. I mean, we're using 1 game sample sizes with you.
Well I already argued tat wasn't my main argument so we can ignore the start of this. The funny thing is, for 2 years the Broncos were a threat to take the AFC West even with the Chargers playing so well, for only one year the Broncos were a threat with Orton at QB...but that was due to Nolan and his defense - How'd they do when the defense faltered? Like i said earlier, Orton and Cutler on the Broncos, its almost the same (i'd still take Cutler) but Orton and Cutler on the Bears? Well cutler has proven who is better.so really man? u wanna use that as ur arguement? of course all of this whos better talk is all determined by opinion and thats a simple fact...bc to fairly grade qbs they would have to be in the exactly same situations....put cutler on the broncos and see if he makes it to the afc championship game...oh wait he already failed at that witha better team then orton has there...
And Orton barely does a ****ing thing to win games!cutler simply loses games for the bears, he wins games but as my franchise qb, he makes way way too many mistakes and stupid throws
Cutler gives you a better chance at wining than Orton does, and that's a fact.
Jay Cutler: 11 fourth quarter comebacks, 15 game-winning drives
Kyle Orton: 6 fourth quarter comebacks, 7 game-winning drives
Cutler is, orton isn't.worth 2 1st and 3rd and a player...hell no