i'll take lester
i'll take lester
30 Team Stadium Checklist: 11 to go
1) Yankees 2) Orioles 3) Rays 4) Red Sox 5) Mets 6) Braves 7) Phillies 8) Nationals 9) Marlins 10) Pirates 11) Padres 12) Astros 13) Mariners 14) Twins 15) Cubs 16) White Sox 17) Cardinals 18) Indians 19) Tigers
New York Superbowl Fan Cam
Buchholz has a 2.36 era man...and a 185+ era......you obviously havent been keeping up with buchholz to think he has a 2.7 era.
If the Sox needed to win one game today, and both Lester and Buchholz were equally rested, I'd probably go with Lester, because I think that he's a more mature veteran. However, I should probably add that the decision might also be affected by who the game was against and in what park, since the difference between Lester and Buchholz is quite small and the value of using a LHP vs. a RHP against a given opponent might be a valuable deciding factor.
I think that Buchholz is an ace quality pitcher in the making, who's only about 2 years behind Lester in his development and maturity. Clay is showing everyone this season why the Sox were so high on him for so long. Now he just needs to do it consistently for a while to gain the level of respect that Lester already has. This isn't a knock in Buchholz. I have every confidence that he'll attain the same level of respect that Lester now enjoys.
'08: 210.1 5.6 144
'09: 203.1 5.6 138
'10: 161.0 4.5 156
'08: 076.0 -1.2 069
'09: 092.0 1.7 112
'10: 133.1 3.9 185
So basically Lester dominates Scrawnyholz in every category the past 3 years except Lester has a "mere" ERA+ of 156 and Drunkholz has an ERA+ of 185, and based on that you are willing to base your argument?
All I can say is that your argument is bogus, and I can't wait until your new matchbox shipment comes in....
What Lester did last year and the year before has no barring on who has been better this year....none what so ever.....
Guru, it seems to me that asking who's having a better year between Lester and Buchholz is a relatively meaningless question. Both are having excellent years, and trying to decide who's "best right now" tends to require drilling down into the peripheral stats.
I think that a better question is, assuming that both were equally well rested, who would you want starting game #1 of a playoff series. And as I said earlier, that decision might be somewhat affected by who and where you're playing. That is, against the Yankees in Yankee Stadium, starting the lefty Lester might be a better choice.
However, I tend to think that I'd probably just pick Lester to start game #1 of a playoff series over Buchholz, simply because even though they are both very, very close to equally good, I'd stick with Lester as my #1 pitcher, based on his greater experience. But at this point in time, Buchholz certainly seems like the team's 2nd best starter.
(And frankly, DiceK seems to be quietly pitching like the team's 3rd best starter.)
It says nothing about this year, does it? That's the title of this thread. But let's say someone actually read your text and wants to play:
Lester has been more valuable due to more innings pitched at nearly the same rate as Partyholz.
As for Crucis's point, it's clear that Lester is considered the team ace by the team, and if we get into any playoffs, he'll be the #1 SP unless he is hurt.
So outside of a higher rate - at lower innings advantage Skinnyholz has, the answers are all on Lester's column. BTW, how did Lester earn that designation if not from 2008, 2009, and the 2007 playoffs? Also consider Lester has done all this - delayed by cancer - and is only 7 months older then Slowholz.
Last edited by bagwell368; 08-18-2010 at 12:19 PM.
I just find it downright disgusting that a very own boston fan is going to underrate buchholz like this.....I mean you get to see him pitch every 5th day all the time so you should have a greater appreication for the type of pitcher he has been this year than anyone else.
I mean, a 2.36 era in the AL East? That is video game stats. Will he fall off? Sure will.... but that's because nobody can keep that pace up against 3 huge offensive teams in the same division as you.....bound to have a bad outting sooner or later, happens to the best of them......but the point is THROUGH THIS YEAR ONLY, BUCHHOLZ HAS BEEN THEIR BEST PITCHER.
What happens down the road we don't know.....but I wouldn't put it past Buchholz to be their ace when both Lester and him are 30 years old..... he has the "stuff" and make up to be that player, there is no questioning that.
Lester is better
27x World Series Champs
U MAD BOSTON ??
Guru, Bags isn't dissing Buchholz. Yes, Buchholz has an eye-popping ERA ... no doubt about it.
But let me be clear, I don't think that anyone particularly cares about whether Buchholz or Lester has been the Sox' best pitcher for "THIS YEAR ONLY". The fact is that they've BOTH been outstanding. Buchholz has been superior in some stats, Lester in others.
However, the fact of the matter is that Lester has a longer history of outstanding pitching, while Buchholz only seems to have finally figured things out in the last year. And that being the case, it is widely acknowledged that Lester is the team's #1 pitcher.
You can overuse CAPS all you want young man - but so far Lester has been better then Buchholz this year. I'm sorry you let your emotions get the better of you.
Now, back to what we don't like about each other:
I've been a Red Sox fan since 1966. I need not explain myself to anyone on PSD. Certainly not a guy that comes on like gangbusters and yet constantly makes mistakes. Go back to your earliest posts I commented on them, maybe you can learn something.
I find your ill thought out mega thread creation tiresome. Baseball careers take years to build, so far Lester crucifies Buchholz. If he hadn't lost time to cancer he might have Buchholz by 5x instead of the 3x he has him by now. Most Boston fans agree.
I'm fairly willing to agree that they are generally equally effective this year, but, not when a newbie tries to force that opinion out of me. No way. Then it's facts and figures and 86.6% higher WAR for Lester and K/BB rates, and the quality of the opponents, etc.