Jeremy Maclin vs Hakeem Nicks

[METS4LIFE1988]

Maclin:

rec  	yds  	td  	avg  	long  	
46 	623 	4 	13.5 	56

Hakeem Nicks:

REC  	YDS  	TD  	AVG  	LONG  	 	
38 	685 	6 	18.0 	68

Which WR would you prefer?

[The12thManOnD]

ill take nicks anyday. Maclin is benefitting from more pass oriented offense as well and nicks has still put up better #s... NICKS FOR GOD PLZ. lolol

[DieHardColtsfan]

Nicks all the way. Has a slight case of the dropsies, but dont we all in our rookie years. Nicks has the tools to be very dynamic. Yet lets not forget Nicks does get a lot more looks in the Giants O than Maclin does for the Eagles.

[hurdler388]

ill take nicks anyday. Maclin is benefitting from more pass oriented offense as well and nicks has still put up better #s... NICKS FOR GOD PLZ. lolol

Well, the eagles have 446 passing attempts this year and the giants have 441 so they essentially throw the ball the same amount. the eagles also spread the ball around quite a bit more so in terms of stats, being on the eagles would hurt a receivers numbers more so than the giants. nice try though...

[yanks19791024]

Nicks

[Labgrownmangoat]

I said Maclin, but we really won't know for a couple of years. Some WRs hit their ceiling in year one (Michael Clayton of Tampa), while most take a few years to live up to their potential. I think Nicks's upside might be higher due to his physical tools, but I think Maclin is more likely to live up to his full potential than Nicks.

[marlinsfan24]

Maclin

[Gary Reasons]

i think their numbers are so similar that, you could go either way. I personally really like Hakeem Nicks, i think he can be a top WR one day in this league, he has big play ability and he can be a possession WR. Having Jackson on the other side of Maclin obviously benefits him, Smith and Manningham may be good, but they don't draw the attention like Jackson does, The NFC East has some great young wr talent. I like Nicks but the best people to ask are Cowboy fans.

[Gary Reasons]

I said Maclin, but we really won't know for a couple of years. Some WRs hit their ceiling in year one (Michael Clayton of Tampa), while most take a few years to live up to their potential. I think Nicks's upside might be higher due to his physical tools, but I think Maclin is more likely to live up to his full potential than Nicks.

why is that?

[Fly-Eagles-Fly]

Speed Kills

Jeremy Maclin

[Dark Donnie]

I like both WR's....I actually think both fit the type of offense each team runs. I personally would take Maclin.

[Fly-Eagles-Fly]

Maclin 52 Catches 715 Yards 4 TDs missing 2 games to injury

[Westbrook36]

ill take nicks anyday. Maclin is benefitting from more pass oriented offense as well and nicks has still put up better #s... NICKS FOR GOD PLZ. lolol

Well, the eagles have 446 passing attempts this year and the giants have 441 so they essentially throw the ball the same amount. the eagles also spread the ball around quite a bit more so in terms of stats, being on the eagles would hurt a receivers numbers more so than the giants. nice try though...

This.

[METS4LIFE1988]

Maclin 52 Catches 715 Yards 4 TDs missing 2 games to injury

Good try but Nicks didn't play week 2 or 3.

Nicks:

Rec: 46 Yrds: 795 TD's: 6 Yrds AVG: 17.3

Maclin:

Rec: 52 Yrds: 715 TD's: 4 AVG: 13.8

[Fly-Eagles-Fly]

Maclin adds value in the return game and if you fools didnt see he made a CLUTCH catch last night