Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: Which WR would you prefer?

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • Maclin`

    10 32.26%
  • Nicks

    21 67.74%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    29,953
    vCash
    1500

    Jeremy Maclin vs Hakeem Nicks

    Maclin:
    Code:
    rec  	yds  	td  	avg  	long  	
    46 	623 	4 	13.5 	56
    Hakeem Nicks:
    Code:
    REC  	YDS  	TD  	AVG  	LONG  	 	
    38 	685 	6 	18.0 	68
    Which WR would you prefer?
    Matt Harvey - 8-2; 2.37 ERA; 94 K's; 76.0 Inning.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec
    Posts
    556
    vCash
    1500
    ill take nicks anyday. Maclin is benefitting from more pass oriented offense as well and nicks has still put up better #s... NICKS FOR GOD PLZ. lolol

    GIANTS

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    8,014
    vCash
    1500
    Nicks all the way. Has a slight case of the dropsies, but dont we all in our rookie years. Nicks has the tools to be very dynamic. Yet lets not forget Nicks does get a lot more looks in the Giants O than Maclin does for the Eagles.


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    3,038
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by The12thManOnD View Post
    ill take nicks anyday. Maclin is benefitting from more pass oriented offense as well and nicks has still put up better #s... NICKS FOR GOD PLZ. lolol
    Well, the eagles have 446 passing attempts this year and the giants have 441 so they essentially throw the ball the same amount. the eagles also spread the ball around quite a bit more so in terms of stats, being on the eagles would hurt a receivers numbers more so than the giants. nice try though...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    S.A New Jersey
    Posts
    10,828
    vCash
    1500
    Nicks
    FAV FIGHTERS- HW-Struve-JDS-D.Cormier LHW-Gustafsson -Ovince St. Preux Machida MW-Kenndey-D.Miller-Chris WeidmanWW-Condit-Rory MacDonald-Kampmann-Douglas Lima-Marquardt LW-Penn-Edgar-Jim Miller-Joe Lauzon-FW-Jung Patricio Freire BW-Torres-Dantas- Faber-Fly-Benavidez

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    6,099
    vCash
    1500
    I said Maclin, but we really won't know for a couple of years. Some WRs hit their ceiling in year one (Michael Clayton of Tampa), while most take a few years to live up to their potential. I think Nicks's upside might be higher due to his physical tools, but I think Maclin is more likely to live up to his full potential than Nicks.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    16,037
    vCash
    1500
    Maclin

    HEAT
    Spurs
    Marlins
    Dolphins
    Eagles
    Gators


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Port Jefferson
    Posts
    4,435
    vCash
    1500
    i think their numbers are so similar that, you could go either way. I personally really like Hakeem Nicks, i think he can be a top WR one day in this league, he has big play ability and he can be a possession WR. Having Jackson on the other side of Maclin obviously benefits him, Smith and Manningham may be good, but they don't draw the attention like Jackson does, The NFC East has some great young wr talent. I like Nicks but the best people to ask are Cowboy fans.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Port Jefferson
    Posts
    4,435
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Labgrownmangoat View Post
    I said Maclin, but we really won't know for a couple of years. Some WRs hit their ceiling in year one (Michael Clayton of Tampa), while most take a few years to live up to their potential. I think Nicks's upside might be higher due to his physical tools, but I think Maclin is more likely to live up to his full potential than Nicks.
    why is that?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Atlantic City
    Posts
    1,741
    vCash
    1500
    Speed Kills

    Jeremy Maclin

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    9,497
    vCash
    1500
    I like both WR's....I actually think both fit the type of offense each team runs. I personally would take Maclin.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Atlantic City
    Posts
    1,741
    vCash
    1500
    Maclin 52 Catches 715 Yards 4 TDs missing 2 games to injury

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    16,832
    vCash
    2875
    Quote Originally Posted by The12thManOnD View Post
    ill take nicks anyday. Maclin is benefitting from more pass oriented offense as well and nicks has still put up better #s... NICKS FOR GOD PLZ. lolol


    Quote Originally Posted by hurdler388 View Post
    Well, the eagles have 446 passing attempts this year and the giants have 441 so they essentially throw the ball the same amount. the eagles also spread the ball around quite a bit more so in terms of stats, being on the eagles would hurt a receivers numbers more so than the giants. nice try though...
    This.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    29,953
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Fly-Eagles-Fly View Post
    Maclin 52 Catches 715 Yards 4 TDs missing 2 games to injury
    Good try but Nicks didn't play week 2 or 3.

    Nicks:

    Rec: 46 Yrds: 795 TD's: 6 Yrds AVG: 17.3

    Maclin:

    Rec: 52 Yrds: 715 TD's: 4 AVG: 13.8
    Matt Harvey - 8-2; 2.37 ERA; 94 K's; 76.0 Inning.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Atlantic City
    Posts
    1,741
    vCash
    1500
    Maclin adds value in the return game and if you fools didnt see he made a CLUTCH catch last night

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •