Yup I would. If were talking fantasy here.
StevenJackson got 324 carries this year 1,416 yards 4tds. Jackson caught 51 passes for 322 yards and 0 tds
Jamaal Charles got 190 carries this year and 1,120 yards and 7tds. charles caught 40 balls for 297 and 1 td.
So Jackson got about 1,740 total yards and 4tds this season while Charles got 1,417 total yards and 8 tds.
Charles did that in 9 games imagine if he started 7 more? Yah I would take him over steven jackson.
Plus jackson carries the ball almost 22 times a game.. while charles only carries it 13 times a game. If he starts all his games next year he will be more productive then jackson
The name is Johnny... Johnny CupCakes
You Too Can Achieve This When You Visit The Fitness Forum!
Idk, but I love me some Jamaal Charles.
30 Team Stadium Checklist: 10 to go
1) Yankees 2) Orioles 3) Rays 4) Red Sox 5) Mets 6) Braves 7) Phillies 8) Nationals 9) Marlins 10) Pirates 11) Padres 12) Astros 13) Mariners 14) Twins 15) Cubs 16) White Sox 17) Cardinals 18) Indians 19) Tigers 20) Royals 21) Reds
Charles has impressed the hell out of me. His hands aren't something to sneeze at either. Good for Jaamal! I would say def in the upper half of the league.
Steven Jax is the better RB. Jax is on a horrible team and is the focal point of the defense because ALL the WR on his team are non existent and his QB was a third stringer for the CFL.
If I'm drafting fantasy football, I'll take Charles because he has a better supporting cast and will put up better numbers.
Just because a player avg's better numbers does not mean he is a better player.
He needs to prove he can do this again. One season does not make you a top 10 RB
He has top 5 talent, is a good pass protector, very lethal with his break away speed,his agility is matched by none, and his pass catching ability completes him. We need to see more before we can officially put him as a top 10,but theres no doubt he provided a HUGE boost for the Chiefs O, they went from worst O to a top 10 with him...averaging 25 points/game the last 4 games, offensively averaged 440 yards per game....its too bad LJ was held on for too long, also, he made that OL look good...first 10 games without JC? 37 sackes, last 6? 8 sacks. Too bad that D wasnt worth a ****, or they probably wouldve been a bit better in the win column, nonetheless he is a very special type of back.