Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: Best Pitcher of All-Time

Voters
188. You may not vote on this poll
  • Nolan Ryan

    31 16.49%
  • Walter Johnson

    27 14.36%
  • Cy Young

    18 9.57%
  • Greg Maddux

    17 9.04%
  • Roger Clemens

    8 4.26%
  • Bob Gibson

    6 3.19%
  • Randy Johnson

    12 6.38%
  • Sandy Kofax

    33 17.55%
  • Tom Glavine

    2 1.06%
  • Warren Spahn

    1 0.53%
  • Steve Carlton

    2 1.06%
  • Pedro Martinez

    22 11.70%
  • Gover Clever Alexander

    1 0.53%
  • Christy Matthewson

    1 0.53%
  • Other

    7 3.72%
Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 180
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    38,988
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by lavell12 View Post
    How is Ryan laughable? 7 career no hitters and by far the most Ks of all-time. Glavine is like the third winningest lefty and probably the most underrated guy on the list. I'm not saying he is number 1 I just need enough guys to make out a full 15.
    Most K's of all time? Wicked nice... Except that if you do the percentage difference between him and K man number two, and BB man #1 (him) and #2, his lead over the #2 BB man is a good deal larger. Not so hot.

    7 career no hitters? How about over his entire career? On any given night he was no place near Clemens, Koufax, Gibson, Maddux. On average he was 11% better then the average pitcher in the given year pitched (ERA+ adjusted for park, and per year is the single most helpful way to look at a pitcher - unless you count the stats that are associated like DERA and NERA.

    Pedro is 57% better then average
    Clemens 43%
    Maddux 32%
    Gibson 27%
    Mussina 22% (twice as good as Ryan)
    Lowe 19% (har har)
    Jenkins 15%

    as long lasting physical freak he's in the top 5, too bad that isn't the same as pitching.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    38,988
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by - Gyro - View Post
    I'll still take Cy Young.
    Did you know that about 112 of his wins came at the distance of 50' from home plate - a mere 4 feet further then 8 year olds pitch from.

    Did you know he sucked up so many innings because it was different game then? He probably couldn't get out of the 1st against the '03 or '04 Bosox without giving up at least 5 runs.

    History looks good, it sounds good, but in reality, Wood's way way out of his league. WJ and Alexander did some big work against the live ball guys when they were done with the dead balls guys, but they were not as good (also older). The first for sure pitcher has to be Grove. He's generally considered top 5 or even top 2 no matter how you slice the numbers.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    229
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by bagwell368 View Post
    Did you know that about 112 of his wins came at the distance of 50' from home plate - a mere 4 feet further then 8 year olds pitch from.

    Did you know he sucked up so many innings because it was different game then? He probably couldn't get out of the 1st against the '03 or '04 Bosox without giving up at least 5 runs.

    History looks good, it sounds good, but in reality, Wood's way way out of his league. WJ and Alexander did some big work against the live ball guys when they were done with the dead balls guys, but they were not as good (also older). The first for sure pitcher has to be Grove. He's generally considered top 5 or even top 2 no matter how you slice the numbers.
    Regardless, he still has an additional 399 wins, so I'm sure that he could have managed.

    The game always changes, thats not an excuse. I can't say that he wouldn't get out of the first inning against a team either..that's not only ignorant of his talents, but no one can predict that, so why bother?

    511 wins, 2.63 ERA, 2803 Ks, ERA+ of 138 with a 1.130 WHIP.

    I'll still take him as the best all time. This thread is all based on opinion, you have yours, I have mine. I simply believe he is the best, that won't change. They're all great regardless.

    EDIT: I know he won a ton because he started many more games and tossed more innings. That doesn't change the fact that he would have been able to dominate either way. Besides, wins aren't everything.
    Last edited by - Gyro -; 08-14-2008 at 06:28 PM.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    202
    vCash
    1500
    bob gibson



    although nolan ryan is the all time leader in K's, and won 300 games. He ranks first all-time in walks allowed (2,795), first in wild pitches (277), third in losses (292 - most in the modern era), and ninth in hit batters (158). Ryan was a great pitcher but I probably wouldn't even put him in the top 10-15 pitchers ever.
    Last edited by nyy27; 08-14-2008 at 06:35 PM.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cool Guy Lane LA, California
    Posts
    3,690
    vCash
    1500
    the big three are gibson, koufax, and cy young imo. any of those three would be a good choice.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    859
    vCash
    1500
    Nolan Ryan
    Sandy Koufax
    Maddux
    Cy Young
    Juan Marichal
    Duke '10 NCAA Tournament Champs
    Yankes '09 World Series Champs
    Giants '08 Super Bowl Champs

  7. #22
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    4,459
    vCash
    1500

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    16,134
    vCash
    1500
    It's spelled "Koufax".

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,805
    vCash
    1500
    I havent seen many of these guys, mainly Pedro, Clemens, Maddux, and Johnson.

    My opinion would have to be Roger Clemens (for my generation). Even though he's in the middle of the steroid scandal, I think he was an awesome pitcher before he apparently even did the roids.

    Ive seen him pitch a few times at Minute Maid Park, and I have to say for whatever reason his presence totally lights up the atmosphere. He's fun to root for, and just as fun to root against.

    Later yall!

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    26,155
    vCash
    1500
    Koufax, Ryan and Young.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    38,988
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by - Gyro - View Post
    that's not only ignorant of his talents, but no one can predict that, so why bother?

    I agree wins are overrated. Based on first hand accounts at the time:

    Young like pitchers of his day threw hard no more then 3-8 pitches a game in key situations. It's been estimated that he threw in the low-mid 80's for the most part - basically BP speed today.

    The first great pitcher known to have thrown hard was WJ. The next one was Grove (harder then WJ, but not known how much harder) before he hurt his arm. According to a player/manager Grove threw harder then Feller, and that's hard. They threw hard because of the change into the live ball era.

    So you want to take a guy who didn't dominate his era as much as several other guys (besides the longevity), and face him up against the game that we've had for the last 70 years? OK...

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    38,988
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by N.Z's #1 Dodger View Post
    It's spelled "Koufax".
    Unlike most of you guys I actually saw Koufax pitch. He was great. But I am afraid he wasn't greater then Pedro. They are #1 and #2 for the brilliant low IP guys.

    Pedro is mentioned in more rate stats then any other pitcher, Koufax is one of the next 2-3, and he's not close.

    stat Pedro Koufax

    ERA+ #1 #34
    WHIP #3 #23
    H/9 IP #7 #2
    K/9 IP #3 #5

    other

    WL % #6 #24
    IP #173 #278

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,109
    vCash
    500
    Nolan Ryan is a joke as number one. Definitly the most overrater pitcher of all time. The only thing he had going was his longevity since he pitched for 75 years to get those stats.
    [CENTER][[CENTER]

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    229
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by bagwell368 View Post
    I agree wins are overrated. Based on first hand accounts at the time:

    Young like pitchers of his day threw hard no more then 3-8 pitches a game in key situations. It's been estimated that he threw in the low-mid 80's for the most part - basically BP speed today.

    The first great pitcher known to have thrown hard was WJ. The next one was Grove (harder then WJ, but not known how much harder) before he hurt his arm. According to a player/manager Grove threw harder then Feller, and that's hard. They threw hard because of the change into the live ball era.

    So you want to take a guy who didn't dominate his era as much as several other guys (besides the longevity), and face him up against the game that we've had for the last 70 years? OK...
    Unless you watched his games or have live tape of it, there's no way that can be proven for him.

    Just because he threw that hard a majority of the time (if it's completely true) doesn't negate the fact that he could more likely then not, dial it up. Apparently, I'm not the only one who thinks Cy Young is the best of all time.

    Again, there's no point in trying to make me believe otherwise, you're wasting your time. You're not doing anything other then saying why my opinion is wrong, then saying why you think others are better. How hard a person throws, doesn't always matter.
    Last edited by - Gyro -; 08-15-2008 at 09:03 AM.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Caguas, New York, Bronx, Long Island
    Posts
    6,066
    vCash
    1500
    Walter Johnson was my pick... Im really suprised that Lefty Grove is not a choice here...

    hmmm no Bob Feller either..

Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •