Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: Burnett or Hamels

Voters
47. You may not vote on this poll
  • Burnett

    3 6.38%
  • Hamels

    44 93.62%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    30,899
    vCash
    1500

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    City of Brotherly Love
    Posts
    10,551
    vCash
    1500
    I hope your not trying to compare Hamels to Burnett..

    Please, Hamels is so much better then Burnettt it's not even funny.

    You must be on drugs to vote for Burnett in this one..

    Hamels is what? 25 years old I think. He hasn't even reached his full potential yet, and he is an allstar pitcher and a #1 on almost any team.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    17,666
    vCash
    1500
    Hamels, by a mile.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,853
    vCash
    1500
    Please tell me this is a joke?? To protect Burnett's reputation im not even going to post the stats.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    45,536
    vCash
    1500


    A guy that has never stayed healthy, and only has good stuff, yet has never put it on the field against a YOUNG lefty (Still cheap as hell) that has the potential (And is fulfilling that potential) to be an ace.

    I wonder who I'd take.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    16,398
    vCash
    1500
    whoever says burnett is better than hamels is one dumb sack of ****

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    17,666
    vCash
    1500


    It's good to see that Jays fans can realize that Hamels completely blows Burnett out of the water (well, except that one)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    32,044
    vCash
    1500
    dude even the stats YOU showed had Hamels blowing Burnett out of the water...Hamels is an ace and Burnett is just another underachieving pitcher with great stuff like there have been so many of

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,137
    vCash
    1500
    Hamels vs Lincecum is a legit comparison. (Although Hamels wins that, too.)
    Hamels vs Burnett is just plain silly.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    13,251
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by phillies1980 View Post
    Hamels vs Lincecum is a legit comparison. (Although Hamels wins that, too.)
    Hamels vs Burnett is just plain silly.
    No he doesn't.
    Carlos Beltran 2014 Stats:
    33 Games | .307 wOBA | .240 BABIP | 5 HRs | 14 Runs | 15 RBIs


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    5,509
    vCash
    1500
    burnett is a sack of ****

    not a good comparison
    The Doc Is IN

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    IN
    Posts
    1,969
    vCash
    1500
    Not even close. Burnett. lol jk Hamels.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,853
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by ShinobiNYC View Post
    No he doesn't.
    I believe he does. The arguement is basically over by just looking at their WHIP's.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    30,899
    vCash
    1500
    man how do you not compare them, im not talking life time i am talking as of this season, theres only a little difference in the ERA and walks, other than that they are pretty similar,stats wise that is



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    my happy place
    Posts
    2,931
    vCash
    1500
    what a surprise, hamels has every vote except for the one from the guy with "blujaysrock" as his screenname

    no comparison. hamels is way better


    Seriously, who else are you gonna vote for?!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •