Why can't you can't connect those simple dots
Originally Posted by DenButsu
Yes of course we are welcome in all those places now
We were not always welcome, why is that so hard to understand??
Those bases were established because of the war time issues invited in some uninvited in others.
Point being we were there on military missions at first that turned into peacetime missions
Why people think the exact same thing could not happen in Iraq is beyond me
1. to take or fill up (space, time, etc.):
2. to engage or employ the mind, energy, or attention of:
3. to be a resident or tenant of; dwell in:
4. to take possession and control of (a place), as by military invasion.
5. to hold (a position, office, etc.).
–verb (used without object)
6. to take or hold possession.
here is the definition for you.......so you can figure it out
invite or by force we are still occupying those areas.....well at least the dictionary says we are
Don't you think that if McCain is elected we could end up with a perm base in Iraq?? Circumstances may be different in each of these cases.........my point and stance has always been that the end result could possibly be the same
Last edited by Randy West; 07-10-2008 at 04:39 PM.
Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government, owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.-Theodore Roosevelt
I'm just here so I won't get fined boss
Marshawn Lynch #24