I am going Payton. I want my PG to be able to shut down the other team's PG.
Type: Posts; User: LosDoyers1
I am going Payton. I want my PG to be able to shut down the other team's PG.
I am going D-Will. He's proven more to me so far. The jury is out on Irving, although he does have potential to be good. Just not sure if his body can hold up.
Shaun Livingston, Josh Childress and Luke Jackson in the top-10? WOW.
That's a very good point. I side with this argument.
I think the top teams will eventually buckle down and play defense. As for the lower-tier teams, I am betting every game they play will be a shootout.
I'll play devil's advocate. Look at who Nash had on his team and you tell me if anybody could take that team to the playoffs in the West.
I'm not saying he deserved the award, but he did a pretty...
If he's serious about making a comeback, he should play for free considering he got paid $14.7 million to do nothing.
I'm not sure who else would challenge Dwight. I don't even think Ibaka is close. If the player is truly dominant at his position defensively (which Dwight is), I see no reason why he can't just win...
:laugh: He's definitely better than Kobe at that.
:laugh:
Entertaining, but not what I expected.
I guess if you can't beat'em, try to join'em.
+1. That's an interesting point you bring up. He better just focus on basketball and basketball only.
I have a hard time putting Bargnani in the top-5 of this draft. I wouldn't want a 7-footer who just scores (which is pretty much all he does).
Before anybody rebuttals with a response about Dirk,...
As a Laker fan, probably not. We do need a point guard but losing Bynum leaves us really thin up front.
Same as above. Paul make us infinitely better and probably extends Kobe's career but...
Rasheed Wallace is probably celebrating at this moment.
Always nice to dream if we got CP3. At least we'd have a competent PG, which is something we haven't had in awhile. Everybody needs to stop being so harsh. I'm sure you think about certain trade...
If we're talking about Matt Kemp and Clayton Kershaw, both those guys deserve serious consideration. Look at our roster and you tell me if we'd be anywhere near .500 without those two. Without those...
I guess no Rihanna means no distractions. After last year, I gave Kemp one more year to turn it around or we should have traded him. He sure is making me eat my words. This guy deserves the MVP.
Tejada's career is done. Rowand isn't worth it, either. Uribe, Tejada, Rowand. Are we trying to assemble a former Giants roster?
He'll shut down that anemic offense for sure. But the Dodgers better get at least a couple runs. Hopefully, it's not a repeat of the other day.
Mattingly must have a lot of faith in Velez. He must be thinking, "OK, he'll get a hit the next time." It's probably been like that for the last month or so.
If we can get to .500, I think that'll be an accomplishment in itself. Anything more is icing on the cake.
Yeah, it's definitely Iverson. McGrady had a brief run where he was arguably the most popular player in basketball, but Iverson was always making headlines whether that be on or off the court....
+1. The top half will be strong and then you'll have the average and below average teams. The talent discrepancy in the East is so much more magnified. Teams below .500 shouldn't be in the playoffs.
Oden over Durant. The Piston were coming off a championship year, so it's not like they were in a bind to get significantly better. The Blazers needed one piece and (I thought this all along) should...