Search:

Buck Faseball.

Well, the White Sox are always looking for an arm, so maybe he has a future with them.

I understood what you were asking and I gave you my opinion on what I see happening (not what will happenn, just what I see happening).

Everything I read have said Rizzo DOES NOT have a no-trade clause. But if he reaches 10-5 status, then it won't matter.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view4/1571472/creepy-smile-o.gif GIFSoup

You keep him until becomes expensive. Not a brilliant deduction, I admit, but it's a likely course of action for the Cubs.

Not really. Sappelt wasn't doing his job (.451 ops) and Sweeney is killing the ball right now (.364/.575/.939 over the last ten games) so it's not that surprising.

$100 million contract for a defensive shortstop is a fair contract? Wow. I still say it's a stupid contract.

Andrus is closer to Starlin than he is Tulo, which means Rangers overpaid by a whole...

One word....STUPID. Not worth that contract.

Pitts is not the clear cut overall favorites to win the SC, but they are the co-favorites with the Blackhawks. The Pens have the two best players in the world, the Hawks have the deeper team. Should...

In the playoffs, where it matters, the Hawks will handle "The Emilio Estevez's."

Mosley was just as good as, if not better, than Heisman Finalist Te'o in half the snaps, fyi. He's better than you realize. He may not be first round right now, but it would not surprise me if he...

Unless it's on a super cheap deal, I'd prefer to draft the WR instead of signing DHB.

Those weren't "lightning in a bottle" type moves, more like a "wing and a prayer" moves. I'm thinking more along the lines when the Cubs signed guys like Gary Gaetti.

The Yankees are going to get what they pay for with Vernon Wells and that is a crap player who will only help very little. This is a lightning in a bottle type move that the Cubs used to make.

Barnett or not, the Bears should still draft a LBer early. Neither Williams or Barnett are long-term and the Bears need a long-term (or two) LBers.

That's a luxury and one that should be lower on the priority list. If he is the best player available (which he won't be, btw) then you take him, but I still think LB/OL/CB will be ranked as higher...

I like the signing. What it does (and if you believe the Trib report about Burnett being on the Bears radar) mostly is buy time for the Bears to decide what they want to do with the LBer core long...

Even though he is listed as a TE, he was used as a tackle at times with the Chiefs. I like the move, nothing to get heated about, but a player who can be useful.

You know what else is crucial to a football teams success? Actual talent.

It is mindboggling to me how some people are OVERVALUING leadership. Letting Urlacher go is the right move. The Bears need...

The Bears did not disrespect Urlacher, they offered him what the market is most likely setting for him. Any team that signs him at more than 1yr/$2mill will be getting the defensive version of Don...

Yeah but there is ALWAYS exceptions to the rule.

Don't expect a Baez call up this year.

I wouldn't necessarily consider Honey Badger a "good pick." He isn't a good CB (or even NB) and while he was a heckuva return specialist in college, I rarely call one dimensional players like Mathieu...

He'll prolly be a solid pro for the next five to ten years, but the reason why I don't want Te'o is: A. I don't think he'll be better then an aging Urlacher next and B: I don't think he'll be better...