Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Search:

Type: Posts; User: dcgiant

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.34 seconds.

  1. Replies
    921
    Views
    35,744

    Scott Van Slyke Designated

    According to MLB Trade Rumors Dodgers designated Van Slyke.

    Giants should definitely pick him up just until something better if nothing else. Not sure I'm linking this appropriately but here's...
  2. Replies
    3
    Views
    528

    was posted in the wrong place. .

    and then got moved somehow.

    Was in Giants forum, logged in then sent me to a different one while posting.

    Any way to delete one?
  3. Replies
    902
    Views
    35,067

    Poll: Giancarlo Stanton

    OK, so I agree that getting Bourn or Pagan leaves us with a weeker hitting OF, and I know the Marlins probably will hold on to him. But what get's it done so that you can then get Bourn . . for...
  4. Replies
    3
    Views
    528

    Giancarlo Stanton

    OK, so I agree that getting Bourn or Pagan leaves us with a week hitting OF, and I know the Marlins probably will hold on to him. But what get's it done so that you can then get Bourn. . for...
  5. Replies
    40
    Views
    1,898

    Poll: 12th pitcher goes. . .

    UNLESS they can deal Rowand for a prospect they like (since they will have to pay bulk of salary).

    Pretty Sure Runzler has options, Vogelsong and Mota were signed to minors contracts, so no rush. ...
  6. Replies
    13
    Views
    739

    Service time

    Service time, Service Time.

    That is what makes it a no brainer.

    It's why Posey stayed down last year and why the same will happen this year.
  7. delete

    delete
  8. Yeah, originally I was thinking Young might be a good pick up.

    But not anymore. He doesn't offer enough. Is on the decline and is paid to much. Also, nowhere to put him.

    Would totally pass on him.
  9. Disagree . . .

    none of them are as good or durable as Zito at this point. He outperformed them all. AND, if they go down you are trading from a position of weakness. At a minimum, you'd also have to get rid of...
  10. Really?

    Who?

    I disagree.

    Still would trade him, but

    I'd take Runzler with no track record over most of then at this point.

    And that isn't comforting. We should have signed someone earlier if we...
  11. I can

    If I recall, before he got hit in the face he was actually playing REALLY well. Guess he did well after first getting back too --- but then the wheels came off. Just never was able to really get...
  12. Replies
    35
    Views
    1,923

    #'s on September 1st

    .282 .362 .498 .860

    No reason to think he won't hit for .270/.340/.480/.820

    After two years of doing it.
  13. Replies
    2
    Views
    298

    First Renteria now, Fred Lewis!

    I guess Dusty is still a fan.

    Reds and Dodgers both taking from the cupboard and picking through the trash!!!! Good luck to them -- we still have the pitching and I like it from where we sit.
    ...
  14. Replies
    56
    Views
    2,295

    Poll: Bump this.

    +1
  15. No way.

    Too risky and we don't need a second baseman.

    You don't sign an unknown for three years.

    Would be better to trade for JJ Hardy after they sign him.
  16. No way.

    Respect everyone, FEAR no one.

    I think as of right now the Rocks and then the Dodgers are the main competition.

    SD is falling pretty fast. A bullpen is meaningless when you have absolutely no...
  17. Replies
    26
    Views
    1,198

    So he'd be a misfit?

    Sign him up!!!
  18. I agree -- Re the strikeouts

    He was only bad at the end of the year and the beginning of the playoffs because he was coming back from an appendectomy.. . I mean cut the guy a bit of slack. He did start to look like the old...
  19. It should be. . .

    vs. a RHP:

    CF Torres
    2B Sanchez
    1B Huff
    C Posey
    RF Ross
    SS Tejada
    3B Sandoval
    LF DeRosa
  20. It is the squad that won the World Series.

    I.E., the playoff and World Series roster.

    Except, we lost Uribe and no more Renteria for now.

    So, Tejada replaces Renteria and DeRosa replaces Uribe for the most part.

    Since they could...
  21. Noooooooooo!!!!

    How can it be torture without the constant threat of Velez?

    This more than any meager WC means that the Giants have turned the corner.
  22. Replies
    39
    Views
    2,228

    Farnsworth - Why?

    We have better options available and will Ramirez will make the team over Ray. Runzler?
  23. Replies
    239
    Views
    8,155

    Not me dumb arse

    From MLB TR

    San Francisco Giants Rumors

    Giants Notes: Jeter, Fontenot, Uribe, Tejada
    By Ben Nicholson-Smith [November 30, 2010 at 10:13pm CST]

    The Giants have agreed to a deal with Miguel...
  24. Replies
    239
    Views
    8,155

    No, Tejada replaces Uribe.

    Bartlett replaces Renteria, and DeRosa replaces Burrell.

    Better Defense, more flexibility, add speed. Lose a bit of HR power, but also have added Ross in the mix too.

    I agree we need a power...
  25. Replies
    239
    Views
    8,155

    No, Tejada replaces Uribe.

    Bartlett replaces Renteria. And, DeRosa replaces Burrell but can play more positions.
Results 1 to 25 of 167
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4