Type: Posts; User: Tree Rollins
Easily explained......ever heard of a little thing called hot tub time machine?
Kane is a scrub on the NBA level. He'll be lucky to be in the league this season or ever.
When you say 'driven by PG's' do you mean that there are like 20 really good/great pg's in the league none of which have ever lead their team to a championship? If that's what you mean, then yes, by...
So we trade for a point guard at $15mil/year, draft a pg who looks promising, pay an old pg $9/mil, and then trade our only true 'assets' for another PG who we'll probably have to pay another...
That lineup will give up 120 points a game.
Number 2 may be Mitch's best work ever.
That's pretty much what i thought...Goodbye 'angry PSD guy'
Yeah, you're a clown. You are the 'angry PSD guy'....i'm pretty sure that is your most proud point in life.
Move on little man.
Yeah you're right we are SO RUINED FOR SIGNING A ROTATION BIG FOR A MEANINGLESSNESS 1 YEAR DEAL.
Seriously though, explain to me how we would be winning playoff games if we wouldn't have signed...
That is a fact. And that is why 90% of this board would have talked themselves into Melo and been 'stoked' and thought Mitch was finally figuring it out.
positive....please, list to me all the 1 year rentals we will have in 2016. I am excited to learn the future.
You guys would have been happy if we ruined our team with a 5 year deal for a 30 year old carmelo anthony b/c he would have made us a 6-8 seed for the next 3 years.
That is why you are retardededed
there are no big name free agents available until 2016...when we won't be full of 1 year rentals and picks.
Holy fk.....i don't understand why everyone is so confused
Explain to me how a 1 year deal for Jordan hill kill s us?
Anyone who things we are 'screwed' and 'can't build now' is short sighted and small minded.
Maybe, maybe not. Should we lock up significant salary in guys who maybe we can build off of, legit 50/50. If it's a 2 year deal we should offer any and every thing, if Stephenson wants more then...
1 year. 9 mil.
That's Jordan Hill's deal.
Team option for 2nd year. So basically it is a completely meaningless contract with the hopes he pans out with a real coach. If he doesn't, it...
Ok. So what? What does that cost us?
Does a Jordan Hill 1 year 9/mil deal sound that bad??????
Team option for 2nd. So why the **** does it matter? Why would you not buy in for the potential of a guy who put up 17 and 14 on 36min...
B/c max players want long term deals, and there are no max players worth ruining our cap for the next 4 or 5 years.
Consider it explained.
Hill may have had the worst coach in NBA history. His per 36 stats are solid...17pts/13reb/1.5 blocks
You have a 26 year old big putting up those numbers with one of the worst coaches in league...
I'm not mad.
1. As Bill Simmons said, the Lakers should offer any and everything when it comes to 2 year deals.
2. B/c of Kobes contract, why not overpay on 2 year deals? Give Kobe a little...
It's not like he has otherworldly competition. He was projected as a mid to late 1st round pick, and thinks he has a chance to be better than the guys taken in the middle to late lottery/mid 1st...
I'm not all that impressed with either. We should sign someone to a 1-year deal and keep our cap space, and then we'll be capable of wooing a really big name when we actually have good players next...
Good god i am so glad we didn't sign him for anything close to that.
I really liked him as a player, but anything more than 3/$10mil is out of the question for a rebuilding team like us.