Nationals by a hair.
Nationals by a substantial margin.
If haren pitches just ok there better easily. If he pitches like his whole career forget about it.
I don't get where the Nationals are clearly, clearly better than it's this substantial.
this is a close one but the dodgers kersh>strasb, grinke<gio but its close chavez should help grinke, bills=zimm zimm had a good year but thats only one good year and zimm takes it if bills isn't healthy, beckett>deit beckett needed a change of pace and is one year removed from a beast season in a traditionally harder division he also had a good year in blue last year, ryu=haren is the ? ryu should have a good year but it will be interesting to see which haren shows up I would still take the dodgers because they still have a lilly who could come back strong and capuano who had a good showing most of the year and was a beast pre all star break?
Oh and the only thing clearly substantial is the difference in lineup which is substancially in the dodgers favor just sayin!
I choose Dats.
nationals because there is some more depth.
Kershaw is the best pitcher there though
I would have to see Ryu pitch, then I would make my choice.
It's close but as of now I'd probably be inclined to go for LA. I don't think Gio's gonna do what he did last season again
The two best pitching staffs in baseball are the Nationals & Giants. The others are wannabes that are mostly unproven.
Stras, Gio and Zimm for sure but obviously Kershaw is the best pitcher of them all for now. Give Stras a year or 2 and that may change
We should revisit this now a little past midway point