88 for sure
Printable View
88 for sure
Nicks...I just wish he stayed healthy.
It's Nicks and I don't think its close
Nicks is clearly more talented with better hands and physical tools but Cruz is more electric.
Better.....Nicks
Completely disagree. While Cruz, as I originally stated, is very valuable to the team, if it comes down to having to pay one over the other, it has got to be Nicks, despite the injuries...IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba313
You've seen that we can replace a slot WR. We had Smith. When we didn't resign him, everyone thought we'd be screwed. Then Cruz comes along and makes us completely forget about him.
It is VERY tough to replace a big time, big play, physical beast like Nicks. Guys like him don't come around very often.
Again, in my opinion, you pay Nicks before you pay Cruuuuuz.
I think the coahcing staff knows who is better. They did everything they could to get Nicks going. Good for my fantasy team!!
I miss Manningham...
Nicks - Cruz - Manningham (best WR group in the league)
But yeah Nicks is the most talented, Cruz has everything except power and Manningham I just loved his big play ability.
Randle/Barden - I think Barden is a stud on another team as their WR2 or WR1 and Randle I'm not sold on yet. He looks like he'll need time.
Jernigan = Sinorice Moss = Cut Him
**** him he's gone bro...his speed no doubt is why he was such great 3rd WR, but honestly, i'd rather have a consistent Rueben Randle than a speedy but untrustworthy Manningham...if Manningham was still on this team, I would still hold my breath everytime the ball's going his way or when he has possession of the ballQuote:
Originally Posted by rhymeratic
Manningham is a great physical talent with none of the mental game. Can still see it on the Niners, last week making some big plays with his ability but then on a crucial 3rd down and about 3 or 4 yards to go, he takes his out route 2 yards short of the 1st. No way you should be running a 2 yd out with 4 to go. Def not with his speed.
Fun to watch, but he's nothing that can't be replaced with Randle or Hixon.
I know manningham himself can't be replaced but honestly, I felt the only receiver who had speed as similar as his was Hixon....if he makes a move on a defender , especially if it's one on one, he's gone.....I actually want to revise my comment and say i rather would have an injury-prone, but consistent Hixon than a speedy Manningham...just my feelings...I never like the kid's inconsistency, but was proud of him when he made the catch he's supposed toQuote:
Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men
88 is the better player. If he would play a full 16 games, hed be a top 7 WR in the NFL
IMHO, I'd take Nicks over any receiver in this game, I'm that much of a fan of him and confident in him, so don't mean to sound biased, but at best he should be in the top 5, top 3Quote:
Originally Posted by lvlheaded
Nicks...
Quick debate there