No, a hater is some one who refuses to give credit where credit is due. 2 championships, 2 superbowl MVPs. Again I say, haters gonna hate.
Printable View
Just cause you don't have the opportunity to do something doesn't mean you can't.
Don't forget, Eli beat the Patriots IN New Englad WITHOUT his best WR, his starting C, his starting RB, his starting FB, and without his 3rd best WR.
If a team led by their QB wins every single game by about 25 points, are you gonna say he's incapable of coming from behind to win a game?
Brees is no.way better then Brady. Brady and Rodgers are in a class of their.own right now. I don't care who you have 1 and 2, but those two are clearly 1 and 2. Then brees. Then Ben, romo,peyton and rivers in any order. Then the rest.
Last 3 seasons.
Brady
2009. 65.7%, 4398 Yards, 28 TD(5%), 13 INT(2.3%), 11.9 Y/C.
2010. 65.9%, 3900 Yards, 36 TD(7.3%), 4 INT(0.8%), 12 Y/C.
2011. 65.6%, 5235 Yards, 39 TD(6.4%), 12 INT(2.0%), 13.1 Y/C.
Brees
2009. 70.6%, 4388 Yards, 34 TD(6.6%), 11 INT(2.1%), 12.1 Y/C.
2010. 68.1%, 4620 Yards, 33 TD(5.0%), 22 INT(3.3%), 10.3 Y/C.
2011. 71.2%, 5476 Yards, 46 TD(7.0%) 14 INT(2.1%), 11.7 Y/C.
I would say Brees is better, and even if Brady is better Brady is not anywhere close to "No way Brees is better".
the same 5 as before the superbowl
rodgers
brady
brees
peyton
rivers
big ben (assuming peyton isn't back to form)
How people put Romo on the list is beyond me.
1. Brady
2. Brees
3. Rodgers
4. Eli
5. Ben
You people are really pathetic.
Eli has more rings than Rivers, Romo, and even Peyton combined. There is no longer a debate, Eli>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Romo and Rivers. Eli's numbers since '09 have been great, so don't give me the stats argument. He has thrown for 27 TD's, 31 TD's, and 29 TD's. He has had completion percentages 61-64 each of the last three years. He has TWO SUPER BOWL MVP's, is 8-3 career in postseason. You can have your Romos, Rivers, etc. They're LOSERS!