Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

No More Results

5 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    The last time we went was rather eventful. I would like a chance to get further than we did in 2005.
  2. View Conversation
    I think you are right since it leads to the conference playoffs, but I do get why common opponents is better for a divisional matchup.

    I would like a scenario where the Broncos play (beat) the Raiders in the playoffs. That would be great, especially since we would host it.
  3. View Conversation
    I think common games are used in two team matchups because they are a better way of judging which team played better between the two. Three or four it is probably different because that is going to be for a wild card, so representing the conference as opposed to the division is more important. But I think that would be a weak defense on why they are different.
  4. View Conversation
    At the moment, all I have to go on is that lists us higher on the standings, which I think means that we hold the edge at some level. Either way, it should be a hell of a fight. Especially since its both divisional games.
  5. View Conversation
    The common games one comes before SOS. However, if you look at my post in the Bronco forum (I went into more depth than I did in the Raider forum), I made a mistake, I misread the schedules and wrote down that you guys lost to the Jets (which isn't true). So it could likely go down to the SOS as you said.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 5 of 5
About RaiderIke37

Basic Information

About RaiderIke37
Born a Raiders fan in 1971, I hate the Donkeys, I hate the Sparklers and I hate the Queefs.


"Don't worry about the horses being blind.......just load the wagon!"
~~John Madden


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
12-26-2011 01:27 AM
General Information
Last Activity
04-07-2018 12:34 AM
Join Date