Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
What do we do for players' salaries that are currently FAs?
I just don't understand why teams would be forced into taking crappy players. And frankly, why would you wait until it becomes an issue to address it when you can address it before it becomes one?
It's going to be a bane more than anything man. 48 TEs and FBs? There are going to be some horrible players drafted just to fill that requirement when there are going to be a ton of way more talented RBs that you can't draft. Most teams don't even use a FB anymore. And then you won't even be able to have two RBs unless you are very lenient with how people list a guy as a FB.
If you have 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 FB/TE, 2 WR, 5 OL, that is 11 offensive players right there. Most teams are going to carry one WR, so that's 12. Then 11 defensive players. Then a kicker and a punter. That's 25 right there, and then you're going to have to take a nickel CB. It basically forces teams to move away from a 2 RB system, and that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. That, or you sacrifice your 3rd WR (which no one is going to do), or your nickel CB (which is going to lead to some match-up beat downs).
I mean, we may change it a bit later. We'll talk about it a bit more around round 15
Hey, in the rules, do you really have to have two TE/FBs? To me, I don't see why a team couldn't have three WRs, two RBs, one TE, one QB, five OL. That's still 12 players and fits the requirements other than the two TE/FB thing. I don't see why we are required to have 12 offensive players anyways considering you only need 11 and are only required to have 11 defensive players.
If it's going to be changed, it needs to be changed now though before teams are forced into taking two TE/FB types.
Yeah, I'm going to make it.
Are you going to make your pick? Baller gave me a list so was just wondering.
Also can you pass my trade for me please?